Nevertheless it is recommend to monitor the revision process and to identify potential need for changes. To get a better overview of the differences between the two revisions, see this free. These requirements, while new in the text of the standard, were implied in subclause 0. We will consistently keep you updated with changes to legal requirements attached to these changes. Communication The development of a communications strategy with equal emphasis on external and internal communications has been added. Many businesses we have helped thus far find they have little in place in these areas and need to dedicate some time and thought to meeting the requirements.
Besides aligning your old procedures with the new clause numbers, you should also consider improving your existing documentation. Communication Emphasis on internal and external communication, and equal treatment of both, has been added. This includes a requirement on communicating consistent and reliable information, and establishing mechanisms for persons working under the organization's control to make suggestions on improving the environmental management system. The environmental performance evaluation based on characteristic figures is to be promoted. However, the new requirements cannot be implemented without additional effort. Despite this fact, there had been little change to the requirements in past revisions.
See also: and Similarities and differences As in any other revision, there are some parts with only minor changes and some others that saw significant changes. Of course, this is only in theory. Context of the organization 5. The main reason for this may be the fact that one of the main purposes of an environmental management system is in itself preventive action. When defining the objectives, the organization shall consider its technological options and financial, its operational and business requirements and make sure that the objectives are measurable when practicable. The sooner you get in touch, the sooner we can help. This structure is now the required framework for all new and revised management system standards.
This requirement is frequently confused with the requirements for employee competence. Comparison The new version has 10 clauses, instead of the four in the old version; and instead of 12 mandatory documents, there are now 16. They are now included in subclause 7. The new version also requires you to consider foreseeable emergency situations and a lifecycle perspective of your products and services during the identification and evaluation of environmental aspects. We passed our audit with flying colours and no issues! Some of the biggest certification bodies announced that they will stop issuing new certificates according to the old version by September 2016. The organization shall decide on criteria to evaluate its environmental performance, using correct indicators.
The obvious first step for them would be to start with a gap analysis. Requirements There are some new requirements, but the most significant are Context of the organization Clause 4 and Actions to address risks and opportunities Clause 6. If done properly, this will give you an overall picture of your system and tell you what needs to be improved. We have a team of professional consultants in most regions in Australia, ready to efficiently help you through. For the organisation, this means that information must be truthful, not misleading, and it must be complete, transparent and reliable. It also addresses taking action appropriate to the potential effect of conformity of products and services and preventing the occurrence of potential issues.
Strategic environmental management There is a new requirement to understand the context of an organization when determining external and internal issues relating to its activities and the environment. In addition to this terminology change, additional terminology changes are included in subclause A. Owing to the increased emphasis on higher level business management, this should also include processes for strategy development. If you get your certificate according to the 2004 revision after September 15, 2015, you will have three years to transition to the new version. The seminar will provide attendees with an opportunity to find out what the proposed changes are, the rationale behind them, and what your business will need to do. As with the previous examples outlined, there is no requirement that organizations transition to these terms.
Major proposed changes: 1 Understanding the Organization and its context. Comments No comments yet The comments are closed. Risks and opportunities, Context of the organization, and Interested parties are new requirements that need to be met, and they should be implemented with caution because they cast a completely new light on the Environmental Management System. Using risk-based thinking allows an organization to determine the level of controls needed for certain requirements, thereby reducing some requirements that were seen as more prescriptive than others. Environmental performance There is a shift in emphasis with regard to continual improvement, from improving the management system to improving environmental performance. There is now a lot of emphasis on establishing environmental performance measuring and monitoring. While no documentation is required, auditors will be looking for evidence to show conformance to these requirements.
Only time will tell which of these will survive now that they are no longer a requirement. Improvement In the future, there will be no extra rules for preventive measures. Context of the organisation 5. However, the committee draft does not yet require an assessment of the product lifecycle. Improved Environmental Performance Organizations will need to take steps to protect the environment and improve environmental performance. Outsourced processes Organizations need to control or influence outsourced processes. The National Member Bodies agreed upon its revision by ballet in late 2011.